HKSAR V. NG CHIU MAN (吳釗民)

[2023] HKCFA 18 Court of Final Appeal 18 July 2023 • FAMC58/2022 • 7 min read
4 cases cited (0 SG, 4 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Practice Areas

Magistrates Ordinance Theft Ordinance

Judges (3)

Lam Coram Ribeiro Coram Tang Coram

Counsel (5)

Department of Justice Firm Lo, Chan & Leung Firm Derek Lai Counsel Respondent H. Y. Wong Counsel Appellant Ivan Shiu Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent Ng Chiu Man Appellant

Summary

Ng Chiu Man applied for leave to appeal against his conviction, raising questions about the proper approach to appeals on questions of fact and the application of the 'unsafe or unsatisfactory' test. The Court considered the proper standard for appellate review of jury verdicts. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Statutes Cited

Magistrates Ordinance
s 27
Theft Ordinance (Cap 210)
s 16A

Cases Cited (4)

HK (4)
(1999) 2 HKCFAR 539 (2007) 10 HKCFAR 368 [2022] HKCFA 9 [2022] HKCFI 3050

Cited By (1)

[2023] HKCFA 27
HKSAR V. SHU MAN (舒曼)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2023] HKCFA 18)