HKSAR V. WONG MING CHUN (and 1 other)

[2025] HKCA 275 Court of Appeal 14 March 2025 • CACC31/2024; CACC32/2024 • 22 min read

8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Practice Areas

Crimes Ordinance Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance Theft Ordinance

Judges (2)

Macrae Coram Zervos Coram

Counsel (4)

Alvin Cheng & Rosaline Choy Firm Department of Justice Firm Dick Lee Counsel Appellant Gladys Chan Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent Wong Ming Chun Appellant

Summary

Wong Ming Chun appealed against sentence for multiple offences arising from social unrest including rioting, assaulting police, and possessing offensive weapons. The Court of Appeal considered the appropriate concurrent and consecutive sentencing structure and delivered reasons for judgment.

Statutes Cited

Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)

s 159C(6)

Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)

s 27(2)

Theft Ordinance (Cap 210)

s 24 s 9

Cases Cited (8)

HK (8)

[1998] 4 HKC 12 [2005] 1 HKLRD 864 [2011] 5 HKLRD 690 [2020] 4 HKLRD 208 [2020] 5 HKLRD 220 [2023] 1 HKLRD 72 [2024] HKCA 871 [2024] HKDC 95

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 275)