HKSAR V. SHEHOZA VICENT KENNEDY AND ANOTHER

[2025] HKCA 687 Court of Appeal 30 July 2025 • CACC151/2023 • 21 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Practice Areas

Crimes Ordinance Theft Ordinance

Judges (1)

Macrae Coram

Counsel (4)

Chaudhry Solicitors Firm Department of Justice Firm James H M McGowan Counsel Applicant Mickey Fung Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

HKSAR Respondent Egina Samson Samson Applicant Shehoza Vicent Kennedy Applicant

Summary

Shehoza Vicent Kennedy and Egina Samson Samson applied for leave to appeal against their District Court convictions for conspiracy to deal in goods to which a forged trade mark was applied. The applicants were convicted after a trial involving counterfeit luxury goods found at their Chungking Mansions stall. Leave to appeal against conviction was refused as the grounds lacked merit, and they were warned about loss of time.

Statutes Cited

Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)

s 159G

Theft Ordinance (Cap 210)

s 10

Cases Cited (3)

HK (3)

(2004) 7 HKCFAR 126 [2013] 6 HKC 300 [2023] HKDC 1111

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 687)