HKSAR V. SO TSUN FUNG (蘇浚鋒)

[2025] HKCFA 18 Court of Final Appeal 17 October 2025 • FAMC14/2025 • 2 min read

Practice Areas

Basic Law

Judges (3)

Fok Coram Lam Coram Ribeiro Coram

Counsel (7)

Department of Justice Firm Ho Kan Lawyers Firm Carter Chim Counsel Applicant Jason Szeto Counsel Applicant Ned Lai Counsel Respondent Timothy Chen Counsel Respondent Yvonne Leung Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent So Tsun Fung Applicant

Summary

So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒) applied for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on the question of whether the offence under section 27A of the Electoral Corrupt and Illegal Conduct Ordinance (ECICO) unconstitutionally infringes the right to equality before the law under Article 25 of the Basic Law. Leave was granted and the appeal was listed for hearing on 20 May 2026.

Statutes Cited

Basic Law
Art 25

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2025] HKCFA 18)