RAKESH KUMAR V. NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE
18 cases cited
(0 SG, 18 foreign)
Judges (1)
Summary
The applicant, an Indian citizen, sought leave to apply for judicial review of a decision by the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office rejecting his non-refoulement claim. The application was filed nearly two years after the NRCPO's decision, significantly out of time. The court found the delay unacceptable and dismissed the application.
Statutes Cited
High Court Ordinance (Cap 4)
Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap 383)
Immigration Ordinance (Cap 115)
Cases Cited (18)
HK (18)
(2007) 10 HKCFAR 676 (2020) 23 HKCFAR 248 [2014] 6 HKC 1 [2016] 2 HKC 393 [2018] HKCA 14 [2018] HKCA 246 [2018] HKCA 328 [2018] HKCA 400 [2018] HKCA 524 [2018] HKCA 571 [2018] HKCA 595 [2019] HKCA 1022 [2020] HKCA 380 [2021] HKCA 886 [2021] HKCA 979 [2021] HKCFI 1194 [2022] HKCA 1321 [2023] HKCA 847
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKCFI 5722)