S,A V. T,M
3 cases cited
(0 SG, 3 foreign)
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Summary
The respondent husband applied to vary a costs order nisi made after the court dismissed his jurisdictional challenge in matrimonial proceedings. He argued the costs order should be varied in light of parallel proceedings in New Jersey. The court found no reason to depart from costs following the event and dismissed the variation application, with costs summarily assessed at HK$60,000.
Statutes Cited
Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)
Cases Cited (3)
HK (3)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKFC 180)