CHAN LAI CHUN MARIA V. STEADYPROFIT LTD

[2025] HKLdT 44 Lands Tribunal 15 August 2025 • LDBM17/2024 • 43 min read

11 cases cited (0 SG, 11 foreign)

Practice Areas

Conveyancing and Property Ordinance High Court Ordinance Rules of the High Court

Judges (1)

LJ Cruden Coram

Counsel (3)

Iu, Lai & Li Firm Cedric Yeung Counsel Applicant Wong, Hui & Co Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

Steadyprofit Limited Respondent Chan Lai Chun Maria Applicant

Summary

The respondent Steadyprofit Limited sought leave to appeal against the Lands Tribunal's judgment declaring that majority owners of La Villa at 142 Waterloo Road could change the building name without unanimous consent. The court dismissed the leave to appeal application, finding no reasonable prospect of success, with costs summarily assessed at HK$58,000.

Statutes Cited

Conveyancing and Property Ordinance (Cap 219)

High Court Ordinance (Cap 4)

Rules of the High Court (Cap 4A)

Cases Cited (11)

HK (11)

(1999) 2 HKCFAR 279 (2008) 11 HKCFAR 117 (2020) 23 HKCFAR 487 [1991] 1 HKC 189 [2008] 5 HKC 474 [2009] 3 HKC 285 [2009] 4 HKLRD 125 [2009] HKC 285 [2015] 1 HKLRD 26 [2024] HKCA 1067 [2024] HKCFI 2992

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2025] HKLdT 44)