KWOK WING HANG AND 23 OTHERS V. CHIEF EXECUTIVE IN COUNCIL AND ANOTHER (and 3 others)

[2020] HKCFA 42 Court of Final Appeal 21 December 2020 • FACV6/2020; FACV7/2020; FACV8/2020; FACV9/2020 • 85 min read
12 cases cited (0 SG, 12 foreign) Cited by 2 cases

Practice Areas

Judges (5)

Counsel (16)

Parties (26)

Summary

Twenty-four applicants, including Legislative Council members, challenged the constitutionality of the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation enacted under the Emergency Regulations Ordinance. The Court of Final Appeal considered whether the ERO was consistent with the Basic Law and whether the face-covering ban was a proportionate restriction on fundamental rights. The Court held the ERO was constitutional but found parts of the face-covering regulation disproportionate.

Statutes Cited

Emergency Regulations Ordinance
s 2
ERO which says that any regulations made under the Ordinance
s 2(3)
Prevention and Control of Disease Ordinance
s 8

Cases Cited (12)

UK (3)
[1948] 1 KB 223 [1968] AC 997 [1980] AC 458
HK (9)
(2005) 8 HKCFAR 229 (2006) 9 HKCFAR 574 (2011) 14 HKCFAR 754 (2013) 16 HKCFAR 837 (2013) 16 HKCFAR 950 (2015) 18 HKCFAR 467 (2016) 19 HKCFAR 372 (2017) 20 HKCFAR 353 [2016] 2 HKLRD 1372

Cited By (2)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2020] HKCFA 42)